Unprecedented levels of disruption and volatility within the Oil & Gas (O&G) industry have significantly impacted organisations’ profitability and put pressure on their license to operate.
Unlike decades past, players are pursuing different strategies to address these issues, accelerating their implementation due to the urgent need for energy transition.
Tracey Gilliland, Principal, Energy and Renewables, Capgemini, said: “Twenty years ago, the oil and gas industry was largely aligned in terms of vision and strategy. Companies tended to respond to market challenges in the same way.
“What we see today is a shift across the players. Over the next five years, we will see a massive divergence in strategy that could, for example, have BP’s business more closely resemble a large, independent power producer than it does Chevron.”
The 22nd Edition World Energy Markets Observatory (WEMO), Capgemini’s annual thought leadership and research report that tracks the development and transformation of energy markets around the world, explores this divergence within the industry through three strategic lenses:
- Tightening the core business to maintain short term
- Defending the core business by maintaining license to
operate in the face of growing pressure to reduce climate
- Preserving long-term profitability by creating options
outside the core business.
Elfije Lemaitre, North America Energy Lead, adds: “Oil and gas companies are navigating through turbulent times as they experience a significant drop in consumption, ongoing price volatility and pressure to reduce emissions. Not all companies will make it through the downturn, but companies that rapidly reduce cost and effectively invest in energy transition capabilities will come out ahead of the pack.”
In this paper, we explore each of these lenses as they pertain to five different industry segments:
Lens 1: Tightening the core business to maintain short term profitability
From a short-term perspective, tightening the core business remains the top priority for the industry, especially for US majors and NOCs. By this, we mean maintaining cash cows, driving universal CAPEX cuts or postponements, and otherwise embracing operational excellence as a means of survival.
While the defense strategy will vary from one organisation to the next, our research highlights an industry-wide investment in digital as a means of cost optimisation, be it through risk reduction, avoidance of costly events or automation of simple and recurring tasks.
Many O&G operators have now set up their own digital capabilities. Though implementation varies— some fall under the direction of the IT department while others are formed as a brand-new entity—the universal driver is return on investment based on cost reduction or performance optimisation.
Lens 2: Defending the core business by maintaining license to operate in the face of growing pressure to reduce climate impact
Research indicates that each of the five groups are viewing the future and making decisions through this lens. In most cases, this means improving operations through a variety of measures including reduced methane leakage and flaring, electrification of field operations and system optimisation. That said, there is some divergence in terms of priority. In the EU, for example, majors are implementing energy management systems where climate-related KPIs are defined and monitored. As such, European operators are now embracing much more ambitious plans with regards to climate change, while other areas of the world are experiencing pockets of progress.
Figure 1 Global O&G Discoveries and exploration spending as a % of upstream investment.
Again, in this area, we see companies leveraging digital transformation to enable deeper action on emissions, such as route optimisation or data analysis around advanced prediction and detection of fugitive emissions.
Those digital solutions enable investments in renewables to offset core operations. In fact, at-scale adoption and deployment depend in large part on the use of intelligent automation to better predict and plan both supply and demand. Further levers within this category include: adjusting the portfolio mix, such as farming down heavy oil; divesting from “high polluting” oil sources; and shifting the portfolio from liquid to gas.
Our analysis indicates that companies which actively reduce their scope 1 emissions will also decrease the long-term risk associated with environmental acceptability, as well as the impact of a carbon tax. In the meantime, they will be seen as a safe and attractive harbor for investment, thus maintaining their key financial indicators.
Have you listened:
Podcast episode #8: In pursuit of carbon neutrality
Lens 3: Preserving long-term profitability by creating options outside the core business
As carbon pressure on core products continues to mount, O&G companies will need to develop a long-term strategy to diversify their revenue from traditional production. For many organisations, this means pursuing options outside the core area of business of pure oil and gas exploration and production. We see the EU majors leading in this area, considering options such as:
- Changing the portfolio mix to develop electricity generation
- Ensuring a market for existing products, including
carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), chemical/
downstream and gas generation; and
- Producing low-carbon products and new businesses.
Our analysis suggests that the long-term operating model will need to prioritise the pursuit of new products, customers and channels. This will require companies to invest in new technologies to accelerate at-scale deployment to balance the losses in O&G revenues. As with any company looking to bridge markets, these organisations will encounter a new set of competitors both within the market and in the financial markets when it comes to investments.
On a positive note, there are synergies between the renewable energy business and the O&G business which can be leveraged. This could give O&G companies an advantage over new entrants if they choose to make the shift towards an “energy-first” model.
“In the end, companies will have to clarify what their overall strategy outside Oil & Gas will be,” notes Patrice Jaulneau, Principal, E&P, Capgemini Invent. “This will result in an in-depth modification of their operating model, as well as their approach of risk management. The leaders will likely be the ones who succeed in quickly converting their E&P talents.”
A perspective from our Capgemini experts:
- Elfije Lemaitre, North America Energy Lead
- Patrice Jaulneau, Principal, E&P, Capgemini Invent
- Tracey Gilliland, Principal, Capgemini
To review the full findings from the 22nd Edition World Energy Markets Observatory, download a copy of the report today.